i have had the grand distinction of being called “interesting” by both a neurologist and a psychiatrist.
since both of these gentlemen are very learned, been practicing for decades, are unknown to each other and are essentially talking about my brain, i’m not so sure this is a good thing.
in addition to a dental cleaning and a dose of pain management, i had the pleasure of visiting a neurologist for the first time today. being my second day of hat tricks of doctor’s visits this week, i was at least glad for the novelty. also novel was being scolded for two very contradictory behaviors at the same time by dr. cranium md, do.
let me explain. no, there is too much. let me sum up.
as m
any of you know, i bumped into a midnight-blue ford econoline e-350 back in high school and the encounter caused a myriad of pesky bodily injuries as well some hiccups in my spatial and visual perception, bouts of vertigo, wee moments of panic and occasional lapses in memory. as i mentioned in previous entries, i began addressing the soft tissue damage and spinal irregularities a few years ago, hoping various methods of pain management would actually help heal my wounds of nearly two decades.
so, i also go to see a shrink to manage the panic and meds that go with it. he took the usual history and suggested we meet semi-regularly both to monitor my medications as well as figure out if my vertigo causes my panic or my panic causes my vertigo, or if they are mere happy coincidences. during some of these talks, he declared me “very interesting” and not in a condescending tone- impressive for a freudian. he’s also often mentioned that it’s insane that i’ve never been to see a neurologist considering the nasty bump my head received upon impact with the pavement all those years ago.
so, when i was last in dr. koala’s office (he really, really looks like a koala bear, and his name sounds an awful lot like that as well- onomatopoeia! in reality. awesome, no?), i mentioned that i was finally seeing a neurologist this week. he said “apropos of…..?”
apropos of you telling me the craziest thing about me is not having seen one in the last eighteen years, maybe.
anyhoo, i go today to see the brain doctor and he simultaneously sternly told me that he didn’t understand why i was seeing him while reprimanding me for not seeing him or one of his colleagues for the last two decades. he kept telling me it didn’t make sense. i tried explaining i was fourteen when i was in the accident, that no one would tell me anything because i was a minor and that since my mom has died and i have no reference for that time period. i was too busy in the two years following my accident taking care of my mom to go.
since then, how would i know? no one gave me the manual or sent me the memo on what to do. what i knew about brain injuries is that they’re permanent and since i have pills to keep the panic at bay, the perceptory spasms are momentary and the memory lapses are minor, what’s he gonna do about it anyway?
after he calmed down and examined me, he suggested a battery of tests because, as he put it, every once in a while you find out that panic attacks are actually small seizures and since my uncle pat had petit mal epilepsy, we might want to run some basics as a matter of course.
so, i have some more appointments. as he put it, if we find something, we’ll deal with it, if we don’t, i just have permanent brain damage from a traumatic injury.
i’m still figuring out which of these is the best case scenario.
footnote: this is not a pity-me entry, it’s being put into the stable of my signature “funny stories” that both friends and strangers alike so completely dread.

Recent Comments